So I was asked to send in a few Interview questions to the staff at the Newspaper at the University of Toronto and I actually got a response.
I am however far from thrilled with the responses to my questions. I also asked my fellow bloggers and podcasters to come up with questions and some of them were ignored and then I got the following response AFTER I did the email interview
“The last four questions? I agreed to answer your questions.
“How do WE frighten YOU?” Come on Mike. That’s a waste of my time and it weakens your interview.”
Joe
So yes I am glad that MY questions were answered but less then thrilled that the readers weren’t even dignified with a response. You’d think that we would get a response and I am quite sad
Sure,maybe I should have had the last question in there but oh well, I’m not an expert and I don’t proclaim to be. So now, we have a weak response at best with no real details and so I am hoping that we can perhaps pursue this more aggressively and get some answers and I encourage all of you to email Joe at the Newspaper @
thenewspaper@gmail.com
Let’s get some real answers and lets keep up the pressure there and eventually it’ll be my hope that we can speak to the author. I want to give people and us at the Fat o sphere a voice and an ability to have a voice in the media, I hope that I have done my job and that I served us well.
Comments welcome and encouraged
Anyway here it is
Here are my interview questions and the responses I got
And here are the questions that were IGNORED
#5 on your lists includes the statement- “you frighten children”. This struck me a poignant.
question: Why do WE frighten YOU so much?
question: Why would a writer assume that framing bigotry as satire exempts the things he/she writes from the larger system of societal power relations? I.e., saying ‘it was just a joke’ (which WILL be the author’s/paper’s response) does not make it ‘okay’. (In fact, humour often reinscribes relations of domination in much more powerful, insidious ways.)
question is: was this just filler? Is “outright offensive” the new “edgy”?
why they thought it was okay to publish a blatant example of hate speech. Ask them how they’d feel if those things were said about a group they belong to. Ask them how they think a fat U of T student would feel upon reading that. If they say it was a joke, ask them to explain why they think it’s funny.
Here are the actual questions from my email Interview.
Still I hope for an actual interview over the phone with the paper and the Author, but we’ll see what happens if we get the interview with Osprey media and some other outlets.
Q: What was the author trying to convey in his article?
A: From my perspective as a reader, the Jock Talk character had just spent a large amount of time reading an “800 page paperback with endless photos of the same ten guys lifting weights with no shirts on, flexing their muscles in various poses.” I believe that this inspired him to write the list. The character is rarely ever supposed to convey anything, besides showcasing what an ignorant dick he is about everything that isn’t the gym and himself.
Q: What was the humour that the audience was supposed to get from the article?
A: Out of the thousands of authors publishing work, he chose Arnold Schwarzeneggar’s Encyclopedia of Body-Building, and then he rated it five bicep curls out of five. For the second portion of the article he made fat jokes.
Q: Is the author aware of the amount of people that have been offended by his writing?
A: I’m not sure. You’d have to ask him.
Q: Given the nature of the article, and its response, is the author willing to offer a public apology and what steps will he make towards the “Fat-o-sphere” and the general public regarding the article?
A: Once again, I can’t really speak for him.
Q: What has the response been like to the article since it’s publication?
A: There is a blog or two online that have engaged in a dialogue about the second portion of the article. When someone comments online, that person usually writes us a letter as well. It has been really encouraging to know that so many people off-campus have taken an interest in the newspaper.
Q: Has the University said anything to the staff at the newspaper?
A: We received a letter to the editor from someone at the University.
Q: Are you aware that people are writing the newspaper’s advertisers in response to the article?
A: No.
Q: Will there be any action taken against the author in regards to the article?
A: Absolutely. As of right now, he is no longer allowed to write for the newspaper for the duration of this semester’s printing run.
Q: Does the newspaper stand behind the article and it’s statements made?
A: the newspaper stands behind all of its writers. The satire of Jock Talk has been the longest standing column this year and we have had a plethora of positive feedback regarding previous articles that he has done from people who are the target audience (UofT students and faculty). Articles such as “Guys Who Wear Under Armour Shirts” and “Are You Really Healthy” are a couple of favourites. The Jock Talk character is designed to be offensive; he is misogynistic, ignorant, and unintelligent. He calls himself a Jock and he doesn’t play any sports.